tungsten branding company logo

Company Naming & Branding


Naming a New Business? Itemize and Prioritize!

Posted on by Phillip Davis

One of the most common refrains I hear when naming a new business is “I’ll know the right company name when I hear it.” That may or may not be true. It also may or may not be wise!

Why is that?

Because it makes the assumption that you know exactly what you want. In reality, most aspiring business owners have only a vague notion of what they want in a brand name. These notions are unarticulated, not written down anywhere, and it’s in no certain order. If you were to ask, it would sound like a free flow of consciousness …

• Something creative
• Fits with my industry
• Has a matching .com available
• Describes what we do
• Sets us apart
• Not too long
• Start high in the alphabet
• Sounds cool when you say it
• Says what it is

In reality, these are both branding criteria and branding considerations. Must-haves and want-to-haves. And they are all mixed in together. It’s like trying to hit a moving target. One company name idea might accomplish two of the things you want it to do but then miss on three other counts. Another business name might sound cool but is a dead end in regards to building the brand message. The issue comes down to itemizing your wants and needs into two lists, and then prioritizing them in order of importance.

1. Branding Criteria

These are the things that are vital to your brand. Ask yourself, “if my new business name could only communicate one thing, what would it be?” Make this your top priority. Then go on from there in rank order of what’s next in terms of importance. Here are some good examples…

• Must convey our core strength of (fill in the blank)
• Must be memorable and engaging
• Must provide a platform to tell our story
• Must have a matching, or closely matching, .com domain name

2. Branding Considerations

These are things that find themselves on the list of criteria that don’t really belong there. For instance, having alliteration in the words (i.e. Coca Cola, Pay Pal, Best Buy) or having a name that rhymes or having the name start high in the alphabet. These are linguistic pluses, nice perks and possible tie-breakers if all things are equal, but they shouldn’t drive the process unless it’s determined that they are truly vital to the outcome.

Once you have both your branding criteria and branding considerations, then make sure you prioritize them. You may not get all your wants and needs, so determine which ones are most important. Our company name of Tungsten Branding is a metaphor for brilliance, clarity and insight associated with the light bulb. It works on the level of conveying our core attributes and providing a story to tell. It doesn’t do well in terms of spelling (Tungsten, Tungston, Tungstin, ect.) But we were willing to live with that. Because we are not a high volume, mass merchant business, the occasional misspell was not a big issue — clients find us if they type anything close. For our purposes, it was more important to demonstrate what qualities we bring to the table when naming a new business or developing a brand identity. The point is, don’t let a minor issue rule out a potentially strong naming candidate. If a potential company name accomplishes 85% of what you want it to do, and the remaining 15% is something not all that vital, (i.e. can’t get the matching 1-800 number with the name) then you have a viable candidate.

Bottom line? If you are struggling with a business naming decision, it might be time to itemize, prioritize and then capitalize on a company name that’s the bright choice for you.

About Phillip Davis

  • facebook
  • twitter-2
  • google-plus
  • rss

Phillip Davis is president of Tungsten Branding and a regular speaker, author and contributor on the subject of brilliant branding, appearing in Inc.com, Entrepreneur.com, Newsday, BusinessWeek and numerous industry trade publications. Phil and his team have have named/branded over 200 companies, products and services worldwide. Google+

View all posts by Phillip Davis →
  • http://brandopia.typepad.com/brandopia_destination_for/2010/08/brand-the-marketect-says--when-developing-your-destination-brand-portfolio-make-sure-it-has-at-least-one.html Alan ‘Brand’ Williamson

    Phil

    Great article.

    But can I ask: Is the company name Tungsten or Tungsten Branding? If the former, does the strapline – Company Branding Consultants – always follow the brand name? If the latter, does the name get shortened to TB, and if so would you care to comment on initialised names vs proper names please?

    • puretungsten

      Great question! The company name has evolved over time to Tungsten Branding. It started out as Tungsten Brand Marketing and gradually shrunk to Tungsten Branding. Eventually, (if the name acquires enough recognition in the industry,) it could become just Tungsten, in much the same way that Apple Computers, Inc. is now Apple. Although Apple has the advantage of owning Apple.com.

      When I started the company, I went with a different domain name than my company name. Since Tungsten Brand Marketing was so long, I opted for the shorter PureTungsten.com as the domain name. I didn’t realize at the time, how much weight people would give the domain name. With no promotion of the domain, except as the web address, some people referred to the company itself as Pure Tungsten. We are gradually porting the web site over to our new address http://TungstenBranding.com, and everything should then “sync” up in terms of brand consistency. So please learn from my missteps!

      As far as the slogan/strapline “Company Branding Consultants,” it was placed at the very top of the home page for search engine search optimization purposes. We’ve been using “Wired for Brilliance” under the logo, to underscore our emphasis on brand clarity and insight. I would not recommend shortening a company name to an acronym unless absolutely necessary. They are so pedestrian that they lose all meaning. TB for example, could stand for so many different things, Tampa Bay, tuberculosis, too bad, etc. So you really have to achieve a level of notoriety before shortening a name. Examples of where it made sense were Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing – 3M, and Kentucky Fried Chicken – KFC.

      Hopefully this provides some food for thought. Thanks for your feedback!

      Thanks